I regularly benefit from content whose authorship I’m relatively clueless about.

Because of the internet’s democratization, who says something is becoming significantly less important than what is said.

Is this good or bad?

* * * * *



Like 22 Words on Facebook and you'll never run out of crazy, funny, and interesting links!



Category: Arts & Culture, Internet & Blogging

11 Responses

  1. 1
    ED... says:

    It’s good, of course, until you inadvertently quote some of the cuddly things Hitler said, and people notice…

  2. 2
    nathan says:

    I think it’s bad.

    …So that’s what I think. (Now, back to bed.)

  3. 3
    Jim says:

    The internet’s dissemination of information is bad for those who rely on royalties for income, and good for teachers who suspect plagiarism

  4. 4
    Shawn says:

    Bad for accountability. Ironically, it’s exactly what’s holding the “old media” accountable now.

    I guess I didn’t answer the question, did I?

  5. 5

    I find it somewhat refreshing and it reminds me of how panels would attempt to read “blind” proposal papers for academic conferences, in order to gauge the merit of the presentation/paper apart from the name (or lack thereof) attached to it.

    I do think, however, it’s good to try to learn a bit about the source prior to sharing it or referencing it.

    But, I’m also not averse to using the quote of someone with whom I might have general or even vehement disagreement on other things.

  6. 6
    Chris says:

    I think that content has greater force and influence if the source is known and respected. The value of content is very heavily influenced by the wisdom, character, and experience of the one issuing it. Anonymous content without the context of the author is somehow less weighty.

    I mean, what if I told you my real name is not Chris? See what I mean? :)

  7. 7
    Richard says:

    22 Words of warning
    Be very careful. You might inadvertently quote Merton or Nouwen . The “discernment” nuts will notice and pillory you. It’s what they do.

  8. 8
    Tim Wilson says:

    The problem is once you agree with someone once everyone thinks you support all they say and you might be a more reliable source than that person.

    I’m thinking about this for an upcoming review of Calvin for Armchair Theologians. It is a helpful overview of what Calvin says, but can I recommend a book that has an author who will alternate between he and she for God?

  9. 9
    Gavin Brown says:

    It’s a good thing.

    x Joe Nobody

  10. 10

    I think that depends greatly on who you are and what you’re hoping to achieve. I personally find it to be a good thing.

  11. 11
    Nancy Scott says:

    An all time favorite comment/quote:

    “Somewhere it is written.” Or, just as great…”Someone once said.” After that, you can make up anything you want! *: )

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Facebook, RSS, and Email



Subscribe to 22 Words by RSS...

...or enter your email address:

(We'll never share your info)
 

Recent Comments

Search the Archives