Writing quality is relative to the minds of the intended audience.

If writing is supposed to be clear and compelling, authors who ignore how readers think can only be good writers by happenstance.

* * * * *



Like 22 Words on Facebook and you'll never run out of crazy, funny, and interesting links!



Category: Arts & Culture, Internet & Blogging

9 Responses

  1. nephos says:

    A point to be taken by those who preach as well.

  2. jennapants says:

    what the heck are you trying to say?

  3. Jenna,

    I guess I’m proving my point by failing to write clearly. :)

  4. Are you trying to say the same thing to different audiences… or just trudging through a terrible book? ;)

  5. KP says:

    Ha! 22 points to Jenna for funniest comment of the day, “sly category.”

  6. leafless says:

    Writers are only as good as their readers. There is no point in writing something their readers do not appreciate.

  7. Elizabeth Patton says:

    I have no idea how most people who read my stuff THINK, (that’s probably a good thing)

    BUT I do have a general feel for my writing in terms of both 1) my purpose and 2) my audience (in a more general sort of way)

    Is this what you’re talking about?

  8. Brian says:

    I agree that a writer who does not examine his proposed audience and therefore write (or speak, as someone said about sermons); however, it’s always quite likely that a book will strike a chord with a totally different audience than intended. It seems to me the author has no control over such.

  9. [...] way Abraham Piper puts it, authors who want to be understood need to consider how their readers think. Of course, a [...]

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Facebook, RSS, and Email



Subscribe to 22 Words by RSS...

...or enter your email address:

(We'll never share your info)
 

Recent Comments

Search the Archives