<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Regarding grammarians who “misuse educated as meaning agreeing with me”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twentytwowords.com/2010/01/26/regarding-grammarians-who-%e2%80%9cmisuse-educated-as-meaning-agreeing-with-me%e2%80%9d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twentytwowords.com/2010/01/26/regarding-grammarians-who-%e2%80%9cmisuse-educated-as-meaning-agreeing-with-me%e2%80%9d/</link>
	<description>Curious &#124; Cute &#124; Comical &#124; Crazy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:51:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chamblee54</title>
		<link>http://twentytwowords.com/2010/01/26/regarding-grammarians-who-%e2%80%9cmisuse-educated-as-meaning-agreeing-with-me%e2%80%9d/#comment-53039</link>
		<dc:creator>chamblee54</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 02:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentytwowords.com/?p=5903#comment-53039</guid>
		<description>Ignorant is another all purpose insult for those who disagree with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignorant is another all purpose insult for those who disagree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://twentytwowords.com/2010/01/26/regarding-grammarians-who-%e2%80%9cmisuse-educated-as-meaning-agreeing-with-me%e2%80%9d/#comment-53029</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentytwowords.com/?p=5903#comment-53029</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but that&#039;s just because word order matters in English.

Descriptive grammar simply means that a sentence means what the majority of native speakers of that language agree that it means. It doesn&#039;t mean all rules are thrown out the window; it just means that the speakers of the language - as opposed to a book - make the rules.

So if the MAJORITY of speakers of English would say that &quot;I don&#039;t want it to fall in&quot; is a sentence - regardless of it&#039;s ending with a preposition - then it&#039;s a grammatically correct sentence to a descriptive grammarian.

No native speaker of English would agree that &quot;am completely I I normal realize&quot; is a sentence. It doesn&#039;t make sense in English (though it would in, say, Russian) because SVO is the recognized format for English sentences by speakers of the English language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but that&#8217;s just because word order matters in English.</p>
<p>Descriptive grammar simply means that a sentence means what the majority of native speakers of that language agree that it means. It doesn&#8217;t mean all rules are thrown out the window; it just means that the speakers of the language &#8211; as opposed to a book &#8211; make the rules.</p>
<p>So if the MAJORITY of speakers of English would say that &#8220;I don&#8217;t want it to fall in&#8221; is a sentence &#8211; regardless of it&#8217;s ending with a preposition &#8211; then it&#8217;s a grammatically correct sentence to a descriptive grammarian.</p>
<p>No native speaker of English would agree that &#8220;am completely I I normal realize&#8221; is a sentence. It doesn&#8217;t make sense in English (though it would in, say, Russian) because SVO is the recognized format for English sentences by speakers of the English language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Turk</title>
		<link>http://twentytwowords.com/2010/01/26/regarding-grammarians-who-%e2%80%9cmisuse-educated-as-meaning-agreeing-with-me%e2%80%9d/#comment-53027</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Turk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentytwowords.com/?p=5903#comment-53027</guid>
		<description>You all say thses things, but not one of you would ever proffer this:

&quot;am completely I I normal realize&quot;

And pretend that it somehow conveys meaning -- even though the sentence 

&quot;I realize I am completely normal&quot;

has the same words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You all say thses things, but not one of you would ever proffer this:</p>
<p>&#8220;am completely I I normal realize&#8221;</p>
<p>And pretend that it somehow conveys meaning &#8212; even though the sentence </p>
<p>&#8220;I realize I am completely normal&#8221;</p>
<p>has the same words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice</title>
		<link>http://twentytwowords.com/2010/01/26/regarding-grammarians-who-%e2%80%9cmisuse-educated-as-meaning-agreeing-with-me%e2%80%9d/#comment-53026</link>
		<dc:creator>Janice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentytwowords.com/?p=5903#comment-53026</guid>
		<description>Hear, hear! Language matters, ya know? You&#039;ve probably seen this but just in case you haven&#039;t: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmLE2bliXCI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear, hear! Language matters, ya know? You&#8217;ve probably seen this but just in case you haven&#8217;t: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmLE2bliXCI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmLE2bliXCI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://twentytwowords.com/2010/01/26/regarding-grammarians-who-%e2%80%9cmisuse-educated-as-meaning-agreeing-with-me%e2%80%9d/#comment-53024</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentytwowords.com/?p=5903#comment-53024</guid>
		<description>Occasionally I think I&#039;m a real &quot;lingua-dork&quot;.  

Then I read this blog and those first two comments and realize I am completely normal.

Thanks guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Occasionally I think I&#8217;m a real &#8220;lingua-dork&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Then I read this blog and those first two comments and realize I am completely normal.</p>
<p>Thanks guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://twentytwowords.com/2010/01/26/regarding-grammarians-who-%e2%80%9cmisuse-educated-as-meaning-agreeing-with-me%e2%80%9d/#comment-53023</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentytwowords.com/?p=5903#comment-53023</guid>
		<description>Do prescriptive grammarians still exist? Who DOES that? Am I right? *raises glass awkwardly while chewing the end off my Cuban cigar*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do prescriptive grammarians still exist? Who DOES that? Am I right? *raises glass awkwardly while chewing the end off my Cuban cigar*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://twentytwowords.com/2010/01/26/regarding-grammarians-who-%e2%80%9cmisuse-educated-as-meaning-agreeing-with-me%e2%80%9d/#comment-53021</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentytwowords.com/?p=5903#comment-53021</guid>
		<description>I fully agree with Abraham on this one and on all of the rest of the descriptive vs. prescriptive linguistic rabble rousing on this site.  

I tell people that I&#039;m a linguistic relativist for fun and to play with those who equate that position with moral or epistemological relativism.  I think, though, that linguistic pragmatist is probably a better description.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree with Abraham on this one and on all of the rest of the descriptive vs. prescriptive linguistic rabble rousing on this site.  </p>
<p>I tell people that I&#8217;m a linguistic relativist for fun and to play with those who equate that position with moral or epistemological relativism.  I think, though, that linguistic pragmatist is probably a better description.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh S</title>
		<link>http://twentytwowords.com/2010/01/26/regarding-grammarians-who-%e2%80%9cmisuse-educated-as-meaning-agreeing-with-me%e2%80%9d/#comment-53018</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twentytwowords.com/?p=5903#comment-53018</guid>
		<description>Relativist!

(Yeah, that was a compliment.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relativist!</p>
<p>(Yeah, that was a compliment.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

