I call fake. Halliday, Resnick, and Walker (http://amzn.to/boKpLe) claim that the third and fourth rainbows are back in the direction of the sun (and can’t been seen because the sky is too bright that way). And physics textbooks are always correct, right?
That blows my mind.
I call fake.
1. The colors aren’t reversed on rainbows 2 and 4.
2. The rainbows aren’t concentric.
SO INTENSE.
and I thought double-double rainbows only existed in science fiction novels…
22 Words is science fiction.
Actually, 22 Words is film noir… except you know of blogging.
Blog noir?
But what does it mean?
awwww. you did this just for me, didn’t you??? you da best, AP!
If there’s moisture. And backlighting. That’s just science!
You beat me to it!
If only they went all the way.
There’s enough miracles here to blow your brains.
*cries*
i… don’t… know… what… it… means…
TOO MUCH
Quadruple rainbow three-quarters of the way.
Not the same ring to it at all.
But, what does this mean for China?
I call fake. Halliday, Resnick, and Walker (http://amzn.to/boKpLe) claim that the third and fourth rainbows are back in the direction of the sun (and can’t been seen because the sky is too bright that way). And physics textbooks are always correct, right?
What does this mean? It’s so intense!