Vintage hate for automobiles

(via Miss Cellania)

From the Museum of American Heritage

Much of the rural opposition to automobiles was waged chiefly at touring motorists. Farmers claimed tourists posed a danger to stock, horsedrawn traffic and even crops.Opposition to automobiles ranged from plowing up roads, barbed wiring roads making them impassable to boycotting car-driving businessmen who attempted to conduct business with farmers and even refusing to support politicians who owned automobiles.

* * * * *



Like 22 Words on Facebook and you'll never run out of crazy, funny, and interesting links!



Category: History, Science & Technology

7 Responses

  1. 1
    Matt says:

    Maybe they forgot that the roads came AFTER the cars.. Think about the defacement of earth when creating roads.

    • Eva says:

      Actually, roads existed for millenia before the invention of automobiles. Ever heard the expression “All roads lead to Rome”? Well, it refers to *Ancient Rome*. Yep.

    • Kim says:

      Really? Are you sure about that? You realize even animals in the jungle will eventually utilize a path so often that it becomes like a road. Are they defacing the Earth?

    • Anonymous says:

      Roads built and used for millenia by people, their livestock, and non-motorized vehicles are one thing. Cars and the roads built for them now have completely dominated not only the landscape but the whole culture. We serve our cars, and we’ve made communities that aren’t dependent on cars (and fossil fuels) darned near impossible.

  2. 2
    zachl says:

    cobblestone roads have long existed before any model-t

  3. 3
    Tom Bowden says:

    The first modern paved roads in the US were paved for and at the request of …….CYCLISTS!

  4. 4
    Vicky says:

    The brand cotnus for a lot, though. Paizo’s customers are gamers in the know, while the D&D brand’s customers, regardless of company, are the teeming masses. Teeming masses are nice on a balance sheet.Wouldn’t it be interesting if Hasbro sold the D&D brand out from under WotC to Paizo? Paizo’d be in an interesting bind. Supporting two systems would be tough. Ditching PRPG would enrage their 3.x fans, while cancelling 4e would squander a ready-made customer base. I’m not sure they could pull any option off and remain intact. I have a feeling the weight of the brand would kill most d20 companies, especially with the economy the way it is.Yeah, seeing WotC hoist by their own petard would be lovely schadenfreude, but I’d be concerned that someone with deeper pockets and no interesting in publishing or licensing a pen & paper game would grab the brand for a MMORPG.(Coincidentally reading your post. Ah, tasty schadenfreude.) 

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Facebook, RSS, and Email



Subscribe to 22 Words by RSS...

...or enter your email address:

(We'll never share your info)
 

Recent Comments

Search the Archives