Well, it’s true… you do alot of things for people you love that you normally wouldn’t do or try. I’m sure this pic is just a lawsuit waiting to happen, but it’s ironically fitting.
IrishLuv: great comment. It really was a double play on words. The initial tone of your comment suggests that, in a tongue-in-cheek way, you don’t see anything wrong with the tattoo, and you are merely agreeing with the sentiment that “love concurs all,” which would make it an agreeable tattoo. However, the second sentence betrays your naivete and shows that, yes indeed, you know “concurs” was spelled incorrectly. And your use irony while describing the situation as ironic is quite stunning. Bravo. Carry on!
The replies to this are far superior to the photo and all that its use of “concurs” connotes. Or should that be “denotes”? Hmm… which verb, and use (adjective or noun) is it? Anyway, thanks for the laughter this morning!
Ya know…..This is an awful tattoo from a technical standpoint. I wish you had shared the “artist’s” name so we could avoid their squiggly outlines in the future.
And the tattoo is right. Love does Concur all. That’s the only way it lasts
I don’t know. My love demands submission. Yes, it’s definitely a conquering sort of love. But, you would have to agree to that so, from you I would require concurring love. Maybe we could have matching tattoos?
Well, it’s true… you do alot of things for people you love that you normally wouldn’t do or try. I’m sure this pic is just a lawsuit waiting to happen, but it’s ironically fitting.
Its spelled wrong you halfwit
Hey, quarterwit.
IrishLuv knows that.
“lawsuit” would be your clue
Do you need someone to explain the whole comment to you?
Hey, fifthwit.
Adam knows that.
“halfwit” would be your clue
Do you need someone to explain the whole comment to you?
psst…That would be an “eighthwit” Possibly a “sixteenthwit” depending on how this pattern continues.
carry on.
LOL! This just made my Monday morning.
* a lot
Two words.
Thank you. I was hoping someone would catch that.
Oh boy, why do people have to put such rude replies to responses?
CONQUERS
I concur.
And I conquer.
IrishLuv: great comment. It really was a double play on words. The initial tone of your comment suggests that, in a tongue-in-cheek way, you don’t see anything wrong with the tattoo, and you are merely agreeing with the sentiment that “love concurs all,” which would make it an agreeable tattoo. However, the second sentence betrays your naivete and shows that, yes indeed, you know “concurs” was spelled incorrectly. And your use irony while describing the situation as ironic is quite stunning. Bravo. Carry on!
The replies to this are far superior to the photo and all that its use of “concurs” connotes. Or should that be “denotes”? Hmm… which verb, and use (adjective or noun) is it? Anyway, thanks for the laughter this morning!
I concur that the notes are conquering the humor department. I especially like Ghengis’s comment, but then again, I am a bit of a math enthusiast!
I visit this website for the comments as much as for the content. Sorry, Abraham.
Ya know…..This is an awful tattoo from a technical standpoint. I wish you had shared the “artist’s” name so we could avoid their squiggly outlines in the future.
And the tattoo is right. Love does Concur all. That’s the only way it lasts
I concur.
I don’t know. My love demands submission. Yes, it’s definitely a conquering sort of love. But, you would have to agree to that so, from you I would require concurring love. Maybe we could have matching tattoos?
Does this mean that Julius Caesar came, saw, and generally agreed with it all?
Yes. He set the precedent for English culture.
That was the funniest thing I have read in a month, thank you
At least Julius Caesar was veni vidi vice. Most blokes these days are vidi vice veni.
^ Win ^ Thanks Mel, the Latin geek in me is rolling!
Back to your corners……Ding……..Round two? Three? four?