The conceptual (“potential people” & “unborn ghosts”) are the actual, eh… just like unicorns and the flying spaghetti monster? Dawkins dables far too often in areas for which he has no credentials. He’s a good natural scientist, but a horrible philosopher.
And who said any of us here are Bible thumpers anyway?
Yo, Scientist. You’re in the philosophy room. Go back to your lab. Cute pics though.
There could have been more decent men than Dawkins, too.
Oh, did the bible thumper get their feelings hurt?
People of many worldviews think Dawkins is a toad.
The conceptual (“potential people” & “unborn ghosts”) are the actual, eh… just like unicorns and the flying spaghetti monster? Dawkins dables far too often in areas for which he has no credentials. He’s a good natural scientist, but a horrible philosopher.
And who said any of us here are Bible thumpers anyway?
Just beautiful