Not surprisingly, teens are underperforming in school as well.
Kids who aren’t getting enough sleep don’t arrive at school ready to learn. The first couple of hours of the day, they’re still struggling to wake up and be alert. Because of this, there’s a growing movement to push the start times for middle and high schools back to later in the morning.
Some communities have already made the shift.
As awareness of this problem grows, more and more districts are discussing later start times. Some communities were early adopters and have reported only positive findings.
According to the American Phycological Association, among the common benefits noted in districts that have later start times are:
• Increased attendance rates
• Decrease in disciplinary action
• Decrease in student-involved car accidents
• Increase in student GPA
• Increase in state assessment scores
• Increase in college admissions test scores
• Increase in student attention
• Decrease in student sleeping during instruction
• Increase in quality of student-family interaction
This year schools in 19 states implemented later start times.
The logistics of changing start times are complicated.
With all the evidence pointing to the benefits of later start times, why are so few schools taking the plunge? The drawbacks are less about the kids and more about the logistics. Changing the start time in many districts means reorganizing bus routes, which can prove difficult as the elementary, middle, and high schools often share the same buses but use them at different times.
Other complications include difficulty for parents who will need childcare or will no longer be able to drop kids off at school on their way to work, increased traffic due to buses being on the roads later in the morning, and scheduling conflicts with extracurricular activities. All of these boil down to increased costs.
So the choice is between tired kids in school or inconvenience.
The shift to later start times undoubtedly comes with come added costs and complications. Early adopters will have added challenges as they try to schedule athletic and other events with schools in districts with different schedules. But, for those who have already made the shift, the benefits seem to outweigh the costs.
Jayne Ellspermann, a principal in a Florida school district which changed its start time from 7:10 to 9:30 a.m. in 2004, says, “It complemented the rhythm of the adolescents because it really enabled them to begin their school day at a time when they were primed and ready to learn. They’ve had a chance to get up, be awake, they were ready to engage and learn right away. There wasn’t that slump or fatigue. They were a lot happier about coming to school as well.”
Our kids are suffering.
Just because something has always been done a certain way doesn’t mean it’s right. The growing pains associated with making the shift will be temporary, but the benefits to our kids and communities would be lasting.