Panel of 4 men on Fox discuss the “catastrophe” of female breadwinners

May 31, 2013 | By Abraham | 21 comments

(via Zogotunga)

Like 22 Words on Facebook

21 Comments

  1. Mark says:

    This was actually Fox Business Network. Fox News Channel had Megyn Kelly in the same debate and she let them have it!

  2. Patty says:

    So they are happy to use the “biology” argument for the validity of “male dominance” when it comes to being a bread winner since “male” animals are usually the “providers” while completely ignoring the MANY instances where the female brings home the bacon: female lions are quite good at hunting, female penguins leave the father home with the egg for months at a time, and many birds have both parents feeding the chicks, just to name a few examples.

    I suppose these guys are willing to accept the fact that there are many instances of homosexuality in the natural world as well, so it must be a part of the natural order as well?

    1. Xploder says:

      Did you really, REALLY expect any men on the Fox Network to know the first damn thing about biology? It is to laugh…ha ha ha!!!

    2. Dagwood says:

      Animals? By an overwhelming majority, mammals are polygamous…but of course this is exactly what these moral cretins drool over…

      1. dsimathguy says:

        The Bible says that women should submit to their husbands in everything and that men should supply for the household.

        This is some very sad news. 54 million innocent people murdered. Mass murder in the worst sense. America has completely lost it.

        For all of you self-centered people who think abortion is fine, America has 54 million less possibilities, 54 million less chances to become great, 54 million less chances to turn America around.

        There are 0 cases of homosexuality in the natural world. Anyone who tries to push homosexuality is not only godless but also destroying society. Homosexuality is wrong morally, socially, physically, mentally, and scientifically. No matter what you argue, it will always be wrong.

        1. john says:

          you are so wrong there is no scientifc proof that homosexalirty is bad your the one whose selfcentered!!!!!

        2. hmmm says:

          The Bible says many things about men and women and work! Women work all over the Bible and provide for their families Prov 34, Lydia..Abigail…. There are women who are widows, abandoned, men who are disabled or unable to provide for various reasons monetarily. Men and women working together as a family in whatever ways they are best gifted is not unBiblical. “Men should supply for the household” …monetarily at least…can not be true all the time.

        3. Bella says:

          You’re hilarious! Someone should film your little Bible-warrior alter-ego, for posterity.

          The beauty of the fact that the western world does not legislate purely on the basis of biblical ‘wisdom’ is that women and men can, in fact, choose to do whatever they really care to do with their own bodies, regardless of your opinion/those of other men who lived 1500+ years ago.

          Also, it’s real cute that you actually expect everyone else to roll over and accept that their unknown arguments are wrong, because your unknown arguments are right.

          Jesus Christ, it’s good not to be an American woman.

  3. TD says:

    I wonder if this is because of the high divorce rate/breakup of the traditional family? Probably is related and it is a shame that so many mothers have to struggle with making ends meet and take care of their children. Here’s to hoping the degradation of our society reverses and this becomes less of a reality because these women aren’t forced to do this.

  4. Paul says:

    I’m sorry, I can’t take anyone seriously that can’t even spell or use grammar even on an elementary level. You should probably go learn more before you call people self-centered. And, yes, there is so much proof that homosexuality is bad.

    1. Xploder says:

      There is NO proof that homosexuality is bad. There are instances of opinions that state that homosexuality is bad but absolutely no scientific proof of such. Learn to science.

  5. K says:

    Why did I click on the comments and expect a sensible debate? Sometimes I forget that this is the internets…

    1. Curtis says:

      “Wow! So many great points… and overall I’d say that was a civil, educated and ultimately fascinating discussion / debate that took place in the comments section…”

  6. trgiles says:

    There are so many animals that exhibit homosexual activity. Including primates,.dolphins, elephants, cats and dogs. And most of the “54000000″ babies that were aborted would have probably needed some kind of government assistance, which I assume you are against, and would be born into abuse and poverty to parents that didn’t want it.

Leave a Reply