This free "exposure" didn't delight the guy on the other end, even though that's basically what he was offering Zach for his work.
If he did have a lawyer, it’s safe to say that he wouldn’t be working for free.
With that said, it got quite the reaction on Twitter.
A little bit devious, and I think Zach is above theft, but the dude would kind of deserve it.
And a lot of people told him he was completely UNDERCHARGING clients.
Zach replied: “Relatively small portfolio and trying to grow it, and I don’t want to be obligated to the level of support higher rates imply.”
Others were quick to share their own experiences.
Long story short, if you want to play, you have to pay.
How would you have handled this situation?