Historic law to be lifted by Trump unveiled.
Reports suggest that President Donald Trump is considering rolling back a nearly century-old firearms law, sparking nationwide debate.
The debate over firearm regulations explained.
The debate over firearm regulations in the U.S. has been ongoing for nearly a century, with each administration taking a different stance on gun control.
In the early 20th century, gang violence was at an all-time high, largely due to Prohibition-era crime syndicates.
Criminal organizations, including Al Capone’s gang, relied on high-powered firearms to carry out violent attacks and assassinations.
One of the most infamous incidents, the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre of 1929, saw seven men gunned down in Chicago in a gang-related execution.
The public outcry from these violent crimes led to demands for stricter gun control measures, prompting lawmakers to take action.
Law to be revoked by Donald Trump confirmed.
The legislation in question, part of the National Firearms Act (NFA) of 1934, was originally put in place to combat organized crime during the Prohibition era.
This law placed heavy restrictions on certain firearms and accessories, including silencers, due to their association with gang-related violence.
The law targeted items frequently used by criminals, such as machine guns, short-barreled shotguns, and firearm suppressors—commonly referred to as silencers.
Under the NFA, suppressors were placed under strict federal regulation, requiring a $200 tax stamp, background checks, and extensive paperwork for legal ownership.
The main goal of these restrictions was to reduce the accessibility of these items to criminals while keeping them under government oversight.
State of law over the years profiled.
Over the decades, the law remained largely unchanged, despite occasional attempts to modify or repeal portions of it.
In 2002, following the 9/11 attacks, the U.S. government placed an additional restriction on suppressors, banning their sale to non-U.S. citizens.
This move was aimed at preventing American-made firearm accessories from being acquired by foreign criminal organizations and terrorist groups.
Despite these restrictions, gun rights advocates continued pushing for suppressor deregulation, arguing that they were beneficial for hearing protection and recreational shooting.
In 2016, the Hearing Protection Act was introduced to remove suppressors from the NFA’s restricted list, though it failed to pass into law.
Trump’s shocking moves on gun laws recalled.
When Donald Trump took office in 2017, his administration prioritized protecting Second Amendment rights and rolling back gun regulations.
One of his first major changes was lifting the 2002 ban on selling suppressors to non-U.S. citizens, reversing years of strict policy.
During his presidency, Trump voiced strong opposition to what he considered excessive gun control measures, aligning himself with pro-gun organizations.
In contrast, President Joe Biden’s administration took a more aggressive stance on firearm regulations, implementing new gun reform policies.
Biden introduced stricter background checks for gun buyers under 21, expanded red-flag laws, and closed the ‘boyfriend loophole’ that restricted firearm access for domestic abusers.
The Biden administration also maintained the long-standing regulations on suppressors, keeping them under the NFA’s jurisdiction.
Trump’s new law repeal confirmed.
As Trump launched his 2024 campaign, gun rights advocacy groups began calling for him to repeal suppressor restrictions if he returned to office.
Last month, Trump took action by instructing Attorney General Pam Bondi to review all federal firearm regulations.
His directive specifically targeted policies enacted by the Biden administration, with a focus on eliminating unnecessary restrictions.
The review has sparked speculation that Trump is planning to repeal the suppressor restrictions established under the National Firearms Act of 1934.
If the law is overturned, suppressors would no longer require special licensing, lengthy background checks, or the $200 tax stamp.
Instead, buyers would be able to purchase them like any other firearm accessory, with a simple ID check and a standard background review.
Supporters of the move argue that suppressors are useful for reducing gunshot noise, preventing hearing damage, and improving firearm safety.
Hunting and shooting sports organizations claim that the current suppressor regulations are outdated and place unnecessary burdens on law-abiding gun owners.
The debate over gun control continues.
As the White House reviews the suppressor regulations, both sides of the debate are preparing for a major political battle over gun control.
If Trump moves forward with repealing the suppressor restrictions, it would mark one of the most significant rollbacks of gun control laws in nearly a century.