Mel Gibson’s apparent cure for cancel unveiled.
On the latest Joe Rogan Experience podcast, Mel Gibson dropped a bombshell that left the veteran podcaster stunned.
Mel Gibson’s conspiracy theories on LA fires explained.
No stranger to stirring the pot, Mel Gibson previously grabbed attention with his bold claims that the devastating Los Angeles wildfires may not have been natural events.
The actor claimed that the fires may have been deliberately started to serve undisclosed interests, sparking widespread debate and criticism.
In one of his more controversial assertions, Gibson referenced theories involving “directed energy weapons” as a possible cause for some of the fires.
His comments drew backlash from experts and the public, many accusing him of promoting conspiracy theories without evidence.
Gibson argued that the extent and pattern of the destruction didn’t align with what would typically be expected from natural wildfires.
Despite the outcry, the actor has not retracted his statements, maintaining that there are questions surrounding the origins of some of the fires.
Mel Gibson now dives into controversy again with his cancer cure claims.
Cancer cure claims throughout history exposed.
For decades, alternative treatments like high-dose vitamin therapy, juice fasting, and herbal remedies have been touted as potential cures for cancer.
One well-known alternative method, the Gerson Therapy, claims to detoxify the body and heal cancer through a strict regimen of organic foods, raw juices, and coffee enemas.
In the 1970s, laetrile—a compound derived from apricot pits—gained popularity as a natural cancer treatment despite a lack of scientific evidence and warnings from health authorities.
Cannabis and its derivatives have been proposed as cancer treatments, with some claiming anti-tumor properties, though most experts stress these are supplementary therapies at best.
While some patients swear by alternative treatments, experts caution that these methods are often unproven and can be dangerous if used in place of conventional medicine.
Mel Gibson’s controversial cancer cure revealed.
The 69-year-old actor shared an astonishing claim: three of his close friends had stage 4 cancer and cured their disease using an unlikely method.
Gibson stunned Rogan when he said that all three of his friends had been diagnosed with terminal cancer and had tried a surprising approach.
According to Gibson, they took ivermectin and fenbendazole—medications commonly used to treat parasitic infections like roundworms and threadworms.
He didn’t stop there. Gibson made the jaw-dropping assertion that these three friends were now completely cancer-free.
He passionately vouched for the drugs, exclaiming, “This stuff works, man!” as he tried to convince Rogan of their power.
The science behind these medications unveiled.
While there’s no conclusive evidence, some early research has hinted that ivermectin, especially in combination with other treatments, could shrink cancerous tumors.
Fenbendazole has also sparked interest, with some studies suggesting it may stop cancer cells from growing—even in aggressive cancers.
However, experts have been quick to point out that while the research is promising, the risks are significant, and it’s unclear if the treatment can be replicated in humans.
Doctors have warned that ditching mainstream cancer treatments in favor of these unproven methods could be a fatal decision.
Joe Rogan weighs in on cancer cure.
Joe Rogan, who is known for questioning the mainstream narrative, seemed to share Gibson’s belief, acknowledging that these treatments are not profitable for pharmaceutical companies.
Gibson elaborated on his personal belief: “I don’t believe there is anything that can afflict mankind that hasn’t got a natural cure for it. It just makes sense to me.”
He confessed he couldn’t prove his theory but strongly felt that nature holds the answers to illnesses like cancer.
Rogan echoed Gibson’s thoughts, adding, “This stuff does work, which is strange because it’s not profit,” expressing his skepticism about the profit-driven medical industry.
The actor made a bold claim that health authorities might be intentionally suppressing these non-profitable alternatives to protect their financial interests.
Rogan questioned whether the medical institutions are failing to promote effective, low-cost treatments due to their inability to generate profits from them.
The risks of fenbendazole confirmed.
A review from Tennessee scientists in 2020 found that fenbendazole slowed the growth of lung cancer in mice, while another study this year showed similar results in humans.
But fenbendazole isn’t without its dangers. Some studies have revealed severe side effects, including intestinal necrosis and even liver failure.
Though fenbendazole is cheap and easy to get—around $9 for a week’s supply—doctors warn it should only be used with extreme caution.
As the debate continues to rage, one question remains: Should we be investing more in alternative cancer treatments that could potentially save lives—or are they just another dangerous fad?