Judge Finds Jim Bob Duggar’s Testimony ‘Not Credible’ in Josh Duggar’s Trial

Share on Facebook

A judge in the Josh Duggar trial has found Jim Bob Duggar’s testimony to be “not credible.”

It comes after Josh Duggar was charged with receiving and possessing abuse material. 

  via Getty Images  

Scroll on to find out more…

The Duggars first rose to fame thanks to the reality show 19 Kids and Counting…

  via Getty Images  

But while the family portrayed a wholesome image…

There have been quite a few scandals over the years.

So much so that TLC eventually pulled the plug on the show in 2015 following Josh Duggar’s scandal involving young children.

At the time, Josh said: “Twelve years ago, as a young teenager. I acted inexcusably for which I am extremely sorry and deeply regret.”

He continued, “We spoke with authorities where I confessed my wrongdoing, and my parents arranged for me and those affected by my actions to receive counseling.”

The incidents occurred when he was fourteen, in 2002 and 2003.

  via Getty Images  

The family didn’t report the incidents until the statute of limitations passed in 2006. At the time Josh said he believed God showed him mercy and gave him redemption.

Then, earlier this year, Josh was arrested and charged with receiving and possessing child p****graphy.

  via Getty Images  

People reports that Josh was arrested on charges of child po***graphy as he was found to have more than 200 images of children on his computer.

Homeland Security special agent Gerald Faulkner described the things found as “in the top 5 of the worst of the worst that I’ve ever had to examine,” the Daily Mail reports.

  via Getty Images  

Faulkner also said that Josh downloaded files that included “a series of child sexual abuse material involving minor children.”

Despite the finding, Josh was granted jail release ahead of his trial…

And, he was also still permitted to have contact with his children.

But now, Josh’s trial has begun at the John Paul Hammerschmidt federal courthouse in Arkansas.

  via Getty Images  

Proceedings with the trial got underway earlier this week as a judge heard testimonies to determine whether previous allegations should be admitted into the trial.

Duggar’s defense asked for the trial to solely focus on the child p****raphy allegations.

  via Getty Images  

“Let’s have a trial about what actually happened in May of 2019,” attorney Justin Gelfand asked the judge, People reports.

However, the prosecution wants to use Josh’s alleged previous admissions as evidence.

Therefore, in order to decide the judge called for a hearing in which people were called by the prosecution to testify.

  via Getty Images  

The hearing, held on Monday, saw Duggar’s father, Jim Bob Duggar, called and his family friend, Bobye Holt. 

Jim Bob Duggar testified at the hearing in regards to the previous abuse allegations…

  via Getty Images  

However, what he had to say was found to “be not credible.”

Jim Bob claimed in his testimony that he was unable to recall key details about the prior allegations.

  via Getty Images  

And as a result, Judge Timothy L. Brooks, deemed his “memory to be not credible.”

“The Court found Mr. Duggar’s selective lapse in memory to be not credible; he was obviously reluctant to testify against his son,” Brooks said, People reports.

After hearing other testimonies, Brooks ruled that the allegations from Josh’s previous scandals can be used as evidence by the prosecution in his current trial.

  via Getty Images  

The outlet reports that Brooks wrote in his ruling: “The Court finds, based on the Government’s proffer of evidence at the hearing, that the prior acts of child m*****ation allegedly committed by Defendant in 2002 and 2003 against four child victims are clear and compelling.”

“The child p****raphy victims, in this case, are approximately the same ages as the victims of Defendant’s hands-on child-m*****ation offenses.”

  via Getty Images  

“Accordingly, the prior act evidence is probative of Defendant’s sexual interest in underage children and his propensity for exploiting young girls.”