King Charles has replaced Prince Harry in one of the thirty-eight-year-old’s most beloved royal roles.
The monarch’s announcement comes in the wake of the reveal of the prince’s memoir.
The book, titled Spare, will be released in January.
People have been speculating about who would overtake Harry’s beloved role after it was removed in 2020.
Keep on reading to find out more…
Meghan and Harry seem to have been the pillars of scrutiny against the Royal Family since stepping down from their positions.
Meghan and Harry said they wanted a more private life for their children, and moved to Los Angeles to live a more normal life out of the media eye.
However, many feel like the couple has truly slandered the Royal Family.
And that Harry’s relationships with his brother, father, and grandparents is “hanging by a thread.”
Although, through the rifts, there were reports that the Royal Family was “delighted” by the news of the couple’s second child, Lilibet’s birth.
Despite Harry’s continuous blasting of them across all media platforms…
Harry’s relationship with his family remains strained.
With Charles apparently refusing his calls on the lead-up to the announcement in 2020. Harry also said he was financially cut off from his father after they stepped down and at first they were forced to live off Diana’s inheritance.
When asked by Oprah Winfrey during their televised interview about why they left, Harry blamed a “lack of support and lack of understanding.”
He also said he wanted to get away from the ‘genetic pain’ he felt from his family, especially his father, Prince Charles.
“I feel really let down because he’s been through something similar, he knows what pain feels like, (and) Archie’s his grandson.”
“But at the same time – I will always love him – but there’s a lot of hurt that’s happened and I will continue to make it one of my priorities to try and heal that relationship. But they only know what they know, or what they’re told.”
Then, of course, following Lilibet’s birth came another controversy surrounding her name…
With one royal biographer, Angela Levin, deeming it as ‘rude.’
As we know, their baby girl was named Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor.
Paying tribute to Harry’s late mother Diana, Princess of Wales, who died in 1997, when Harry was just twelve.
The name Lilibet is also a tribute to Queen Elizabeth II herself.
A family pet name, the Queen bestowed it on herself as a child as she couldn’t pronounce the name Elizabeth. The name was particularly used by the Queen’s late husband Prince Philip. It was also used by her doting father, King George VI.
But, despite the tribute, people still weren’t happy with some even accusing that, by using the Queen’s private pet name as a first name, Harry had broken royal protocol.
Harry was heavily criticized for taking such a private, intimate pet name and giving it to his child, after what some are calling an ‘onslaught of abuse’ against his grandmother and The Firm.
Royal commentator, Richard Kay, suggested that it may be a step too far for Meghan and Harry to name their daughter Lilibet.
Writing in a column for the Daily Mail, he said: “By giving the baby the name Lilibet, the Queen’s private family nickname – even though they intend to use the diminutive ‘Lili’ for their daughter – there is a risk.”
“Will it be seen as a presumptuous choice for a royal baby who is eighth in line to the throne, but who will grow up on the other side of the world speaking with an American accent?”
“It is tempting to wonder if Harry would have been so emboldened in his choice if his grandfather Prince Philip – the only close family member permitted to call the Queen ‘Lilibet’ – had still been alive.”
“Doubtless, there will be among the more cautious courtiers at the Palace some discomfort and the odd raised eyebrow at this latest convention-destroying Exocet from the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.”
There was a mixed response to the name, with some believing that the couple were pandering to the Queen for forgiveness, whilst others thought that it was a touching tribute.
But the scrutiny didn’t end there for Harry and Meghan.
During the funeral of the late Queen, people have been keeping their eyes on Meghan and Harry.
One of which was none other than Jeremy Clarkson.
Former Top Gear star, Jeremy Clarkson doubted whether Meghan Markle actually shed tears at the Queen’s funeral back in Spetember.
In his column for The Sun he said: “I don’t want to sound like Piers Morgan, who’s obsessed with the Markle, because I never want to sound like Piers Morgan.
“But I’m afraid there’s no way around it. He’s right. And I am going to sound like him when I say, ‘Those two are unhinged.’”
Clarkson continued: “Sure, we were shown pictures of you crying at the funeral, but you’re an actor, for crying out loud. Not a very good one, I admit, but an actor nevertheless.”
“And actors can cry on demand. Even I can. And, on a number of occasions, have.
“I very much doubt those tears were real. Because why would you cry at the funeral of someone who fronted an organization that you very obviously despise,” he said.
Things weren’t looking up for Harry and Meghan, and neither of them couldn’t be left alone.
Following the countless backlash the couple received, there’s no denying people want to know more about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex than any other royal members.
Last year, Penguin Random House broke the news of Harry’s memoir, and now, the title of it has finally been released.
The memoir will include his own account of his decision to give up royal duties and his move to the US.
Random House spoke about the book, writing: “As Diana, Princess of Wales, was laid to rest, billions wondered what the princes must be thinking and feeling – and how their lives would play out.
“For Harry, this is his story at last.”
Harry was reportedly paid an advance of $20 million for the book as part of a 3-title deal.
When his memoir was first announced back in July 2021…
It was described as, an “inspiring, courageous, and uplifting human story.”
But it now appears the tone of the book has darkened, being described now as a “personal journey from trauma to healing.”
His memoir has also sparked a few concerns with regard to what the Royal Family will think about it.
Royal author Richard Fitzwilliams suggested that the Royal Family would be “very concerned” by how the book was being promoted.
He told MailOnline: “It is a sensational title and implies that the writer was not valued or certainly that he did not feel at the center of events.”
Fitzwilliams added: “When the blurb speaks of ”raw, unflinching honesty” the Palace will be very concerned, especially since these are the early months of King Charles’s reign.”
The memoir has been titled Spare, which was inspired by Harry’s nickname as a child being the ‘spare’ prince — in contrast to his brother Prince William as the ‘heir’.
And now, it appears the Royal Family have hit back at Harry’s announcement, as they have finally revealed who his beloved title will go to.
The Duke of Sussex previously held the honorary Captain General of the Royal Marines title, which he said he was “saddened” to lose when he announced he was stepping back from royal duties in 2020.
The title will go to his father, King Charles.
The Daily Mail reports that it was originally thought that Princess Anne would receive the title.
In a message to celebrate the Marines’ 358th birthday, the King said: “It is the greatest possible pleasure to assume the role of your Captain General.
“I am exceptionally proud to follow in the footsteps of so many members of my family over the last three-and-a-half centuries, all of whom held the role with a deep sense of admiration.”
“The Royal Marines have a distinguished and unparalleled history, both on land and at sea.
“I draw immense inspiration from your courage, determination, self-discipline and a remarkable capacity to endure in the most extreme environments,” he continued.
“I feel greatly honoured to become part of the Corps Family and very much look forward to meeting many of you in the near future.
“In the meantime, this comes with my heartfelt and special wishes for a very happy 358th birthday. Per Mare, Per Terram,” the King finished.
What do you think?