The Olympic boxing arena is sizzling with controversy as Australia’s Marissa Williamson demands answers about Algerian boxer Imane Khelif’s DNA amid an uproar.
Williamson, who was slated to face Khelif in the women’s 66kg quarter-finals, will instead watch from the sidelines after a stunning loss to Hungary’s Anna Luca Hamori in Paris.
Hamori’s victory now paves the way for Khelif, whose recent triumph over Italian Angela Carini has ignited fierce debate.
 Khelif’s brutal display against Carini, which lasted a mere 46 seconds, has raised eyebrows after Carini withdrew, claiming she had “never been hit so hard in my life.”
The controversy is fueled by Khelif’s troubled past with gender eligibility tests, which led to her exclusion from the 2023 World Championships.
Despite this, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has cleared Khelif to compete in Paris, leading to an outcry from the boxing community.
Williamson, feeling the heat, is now calling for Khelif to reveal her DNA test results and accusing the IOC of unfairness.
“Obviously, at the moment it’s just speculation,” Williamson told Nine after her defeat.
“Allegedly, there have been DNA tests showing Imane is XY, so if that’s the case, come forward with that and own up to it,” she demanded.
 “The IOC should step in because making it fair for one person is making it unjust for so many more.”
The controversy deepens with Carini’s dramatic exit from the ring, where she was left in tears after taking two powerful punches from Khelif.
The blows not only disrupted her focus but also knocked off her chin strap, leading to her abrupt decision to forfeit the match.
Carini, visibly distressed, was seen crying as the referee declared Khelif the winner, a poignant end to her Olympic dreams.
 Adding fuel to the fire, Khelif’s past is marred by allegations of failed gender eligibility tests due to elevated testosterone levels.
The IOC’s decision to allow Khelif to compete has been controversial, with critics arguing it undermines fairness in the sport.
The Algerian Olympic Committee (COA) has labeled the disqualification at last year’s World Championships as a “conspiracy.”
They claim the elevated testosterone levels were due to “medical reasons,” not a ploy to gain a competitive edge.
The International Boxing Association (IBA) has defended its decision, stating it was based on a “meticulous review” of the evidence.
The IBA’s statement comes after the IOC’s clear stance on maintaining eligibility based on passport information, a policy that has not satisfied all stakeholders.
In the midst of the uproar, three-weight world champion Claressa Shields has voiced her concerns on social media.
Shields, a two-time Olympic gold medalist, expressed her frustration on X, writing, “So they got men fighting against women in the Olympics boxing!”
“I wouldn’t have stood for that! It’s heartbreaking for women who have their dreams ruined. Sad asf!”
Shields’ comments reflect a broader discontent within the boxing community regarding gender fairness in the sport.
 The debate surrounding Khelif and Carini has stirred passionate responses from athletes and fans alike, highlighting the complexities of gender regulations in sports.
The IOC’s decision has faced criticism for perceived inconsistencies, especially considering Khelif’s past issues with testosterone levels.
 Khelif’s participation in Paris remains a contentious issue, with debates about her eligibility continuing to simmer.
Williamson’s call for transparency and Khelif’s contentious history with gender eligibility have spotlighted the ongoing struggle for fairness in Olympic boxing.
As the Paris Games approach, the spotlight remains on Khelif’s participation and the broader implications for the sport.
The saga underscores the challenges of balancing fairness, regulations, and athletes’ rights in the high-stakes environment of the Olympics.
With high-profile figures like Claressa Shields and Marissa Williamson weighing in, the pressure on the IOC to address these issues is mounting.
The boxing world is in turmoil as these controversies unfold, leaving many questioning the integrity of the sport.
As Khelif prepares for her next bout, the focus will be on whether the IOC can resolve the issues surrounding gender eligibility and maintain the sport’s credibility.
The battle over Khelif’s eligibility is more than just a headline; it’s a reflection of the broader challenges facing sports today.
Will the IOC’s actions provide clarity, or will the debate continue to overshadow the athletes’ achievements?
 The outcome of this controversy will have lasting effects on the sport and its regulations.
With every passing day, the drama surrounding Khelif, Williamson, and Carini becomes more intense, captivating the sports world.
 The fight for fairness in Olympic boxing is far from over, and all eyes are on how the situation will unfold.
As the Games continue, the boxing community will be watching closely to see if resolutions are reached.
The IOC’s response will be crucial in determining the future of gender eligibility in sports.
 For now, the world waits, eager to see how this high-stakes controversy will impact the Paris Olympics.
 The struggle for transparency and fairness is a defining issue of these Games, and its resolution will set a precedent for the future.
With tensions running high, the boxing world is poised for further developments in this unfolding drama.
The complexities of gender regulations in sports are being tested like never before, raising critical questions about equity and justice.
Stay tuned as this gripping story continues to evolve, shaping the narrative of Olympic boxing.
The ultimate resolution will not only impact the athletes involved but also redefine the standards of fairness in competitive sports.